http://www.epapercentral.com/forums/ The definitive site for electronic paper news & information en Fri, 10 Sep 2010 04:03:18 +0000 http://www.epapercentral.com/forums/e-paper-developers-and-manufacturers/investors-blocking-e-ink-deal/#post-410 Tue, 23 Jun 2009 02:29:09 +0000 admin 410@http://www.epapercentral.com/forums/ <p>I agree! Do you think the pvi acquisition will reduce the costs of e-ink e-readers? They will need competition or the market will be a bit monopolistic </p> http://www.epapercentral.com/forums/e-paper-developers-and-manufacturers/investors-blocking-e-ink-deal/#post-409 Mon, 22 Jun 2009 19:20:03 +0000 keysersoze 409@http://www.epapercentral.com/forums/ <p>Also something worth mentioning - PVI refused to comment on whether E-Ink are profitable which reduces the price which they value them at. The shareholders and investors who have stuck with E-Ink obviously want something back for that but they are valueing the company based on predicted sales and PVI on actual sales. What a silly game! </p> http://www.epapercentral.com/forums/e-paper-developers-and-manufacturers/investors-blocking-e-ink-deal/#post-407 Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:32:29 +0000 keysersoze 407@http://www.epapercentral.com/forums/ <p>Interesting - I'm not really that bothered from some points of view, but I hope it does happen as it might drive the industry faster and harder. </p> http://www.epapercentral.com/forums/e-paper-developers-and-manufacturers/investors-blocking-e-ink-deal/#post-404 Mon, 22 Jun 2009 07:47:31 +0000 sasha 404@http://www.epapercentral.com/forums/ <p>I wonder if E ink will be able to sell to PVI after all. </p> <p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/paiddealsAtoms/idUS6634378320090616" rel="nofollow">http://www.reuters.com/article/paiddealsAtoms/idUS6634378320090616</a> </p>